From the crowded streets full of harried shoppers, to the heaping mountains of diet-busting treats, to the twinkling lights in my neighbourhood, it’s clear that Christmas really is just around the corner and everyone is getting in the spirit. That includes Mr. Green and me. In our house, ‘tis the season for eating, drinking and debating whether a real or fake Christmas tree is better for the environment.
Last year we bantered back and forth, attempting to convince the other that we had the greenest answer when it came to decking the halls.
I believe that a real Christmas tree is the smartest choice for the planet and, perhaps surprisingly, Mr. Green disagrees. He believes that the polyethylene branches of a fake tree are the most responsible environmental choice.
In my mind, the toxic plastics and energy required to produce, then ship a fake tree, usually all the way from China, makes using the real thing the greenest choice. And surely based on how you dispose of the tree alone, composting vs. a lifetime in a landfill, would tip the scales in favour of a jaunty pine or balsam tree.
On the other hand, Mr. Green believes that chopping a tree down every year – robbing the planet of its environmental benefit – is wasteful and he’d rather reuse a fake tree for 15 years than chop 15 real ones down. He tells me that once the fake tree is manufactured it is “inert,” meaning it won’t have any more affect on the environment. I wasn’t buying that, so asked him about how harmful it is to have landfills full of plastic trees with branches leeching harmful chemicals into the soil and water systems. He simply replied that our landfills are sophisticated enough to dispose of plastic trees safely.
Last Christmas the debate ended in a draw, but this year with more on the line – we actually were planning to buy our first tree together – our debate continued over many days and until we reached a decision.
Drum roll please …
Thanks to some internet sleuthing on my part and with the help of some Montreal environmental consultants and David Suzuki, we bought a real tree!
It’s a handsome little Douglas Fir that we found on the cheap and happily carried home on the subway – the urban equivalent of driving out to the woods and bringing your freshly chopped tree home on a sleigh.

Mr. Green trimming the tree
Recently, Ellipsos, a sustainability research firm, conducted a life-cycle assessment of real and fake trees, and they found that a fake tree would have to be reused more than 20 times to be greener than buying a real tree annually.
Another thing to consider is that Christmas trees are grown like crops, with the sole purpose of being harvested and later enjoyed in people’s homes. And in the years before they become the focal point of holiday decorating the trees provide a natural home to birds and other species, all while generating oxygen and cleaning the air.
Christmas tree farms also preserve valuable green space and farmland from developers. And for people who have farmland that can’t support other crops, farming Christmas trees offers a viable way to make a profit.
The final point goes to one of the Ellipsos researchers:
“When you really consider it, if you exchange a couple of days of commuting by car with carpooling or riding a bicycle, you’ll completely overcompensate for whatever the impact of the tree is,” he said. “It’s not such a big deal. Enjoy your tree, whichever one you prefer.”
It seems that this Christmas Mr. Green got a little greener and we got to pick out our first real tree together. And for those of you who are wondering, the LED light battle is one I can’t win. But despite the blue-ish glow of our white twinkle lights, our tree looks just lovely. Don’t you think?

Our first "green" tree!
: